Archive for May, 2009

Courtney
Gray Haupt

FDA’s New Mission: Embracing Public Health

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Hamburg and Sharfstein

From heparin and H1N1 to the whole range of farm-to-fork food safety issues that have dominated headlines, it's been quite a ride recently at the FDA.  An April 2009 poll from Harris Interactive/HealthDay reported that about half of all Americans still give the FDA a negative rating on its ability to protect the nation's food and drug supply. While these figures actually represent a slight improvement over the public's opinion in 2008, the Obama FDA finds itself at a critical time for revamping the nation's confidence in the agency.

Perhaps with this in mind, newly-minted FDA Commissioner Peggy Hamburg and her Principal Deputy Commissioner, Joshua Sharfstein, have written a Perspective piece in this week's New England Journal of Medicine outlining their shared vision for the agency. 

They propose a plan to transform the FDA from a body often perceived as managing inspections and approvals into one with a science-based, public health mission at its core - a seemingly wise platform to rebuild the public's trust and Congressional support on.  The FDA will "promote health, prevent illness and prolong life" by ensuring that the nation has "access to a safe and nutritious food supply and to innovative and effective medical products." 

In addressing the challenges the agency faces balancing scientific innovation with regulatory protections, the immediate need of enhancing risk communication is highlighted.  Hamburg and Sharfstein assert that the FDA "must communicate frequently and clearly about risks and benefits" and reaffirm the agency's commitment to transparency.   It's also welcome news to see the FDA emphasizing enhanced collaboration with USDA and across HHS - with CDC, CMS and NIH - as well as with outside partners, an element critical to the government's success in managing emerging crises.

Of course, the agency remains woefully under-funded and significant improvements will require increased resources and support.  Public confidence will take time to evolve. However, Hamburg and Sharfstein are off to an encouraging start with their public health campaign. Perhaps improving our opinion of the FDA's ability to advance national health is finally a mission...possible?

Courtney Gray Haupt, Senior Director, Public Affairs and Health Policy

Tags: , , , ,

 
John
Seng

"Text Not Found"

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

That's the message that popped up on screen this morning as I searched for the term "value" in Steven Pearlstein's column on health reform as well as in the related commentary on "The Washington Post" Web site.

The reason no coherent health system exists, and the reason we spend so much on health is because Americans have no legitimate sense of health value.

We don't know what health care truly costs us as individuals, and thus, we cannot begin to pretend that we value health in the strictest definition of "value."

Not only do we need to talk about it - we need to study health value. As Congress and the Administration undertake health reform, what if they understood how Americans value health care when they consider their own money being spent? For the first time, policymakers could benefit from a true sense of value. "Budget scolders," as Pearlstein describes them, could begin to make and enforce tough choices - the choices that Americans have already made in their minds in consideration of finite resources.

Last week, Spectrum released findings of the first, nationally representative study of its kind on health value, which will hopefully add to discussions in health reform: Visit www.healthvaluestudy.com.

Much of the information out there evaluates cost-effectiveness, e.g.  are we getting our money's worth with any given procedure, technology, medication or program? But that's overlooking a crucial insight: How do we really value health?

John Seng, Founder and President

Tags: , , , , ,

 
Catherine
Morrison

Sin Tax for Health Care: Will it Work?

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

At least once every ten years for the last century, the United States has attempted to reform its health care system.  This decade's attempt is inspired by a new President, a strong Democratic majority, and more than anything, health care costs with no sign of slowing.  Health care spending is growing faster than any other segment of the economy and its only getting worse.  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid estimates total health care spending will rise above 20 percent of GDP by 2018.

Policymakers on Capitol Hill are hosting a series of round tables on how to expand access to the nearly 50 million uninsured Americans, improve quality health outcomes, and finally, how to pay for this system change.

On Monday, the leaders of the Senate Finance Committee released the final of three papers on the task of paying for health reform.  The paper details several options to pay for necessary reforms, including health system savings (e.g. eliminating wasteful spending), and taxation ideas (e.g. eliminating health care subsidies).  The committee's third idea, "lifestyle tax proposals," intends to generate new revenue.

Specifically, the Finance Committee is proposing to raise and standardize the tax on alcoholic beverages and create a new excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.   The taxes are designed to discourage unhealthy behaviors which lead to increased health costs through chronic disease.

Sometimes referred to as "sin taxes," excise taxes on tobacco products have proven extremely effective in reducing smoking initiation (especially among adolescents), and helping people quit the habit.  Opponents of tobacco taxes argue these disproportionately impact low-income individuals, as these communities are more sensitive to price changes.  A similar argument can be made of the newest tax ideas.  An added layer, research shows that liquor stores are more prevalent in low-income and minority neighborhoods and grocery stores are just the opposite.  Perhaps a funding initiative to increase healthy choices is the appropriate pathway towards chronic disease prevention.

The most important question - will the experiment work -- how much more are you willing to pay for that Coke-Cola? And since Diet Coke is exempt from the sugar-tax, are you willing to change your behaviors?

Catherine Morrison, Legislative & Public Affairs Associate

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
Courtney
Gray Haupt

Chronic Disease by the Numbers

Monday, May 18th, 2009

The Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease (PFCD) just released its 2009 Almanac of Chronic Disease, which profiles the economic impact of the ever-growing chronic disease epidemic.

I couldn't make it to PFCD's event yesterday at the National Press Club, so I downloaded a copy of the report to read - and immediately shared it with everyone I work with on prevention and public health issues.  The Almanac is chocked full of excellent data on how policy action now to combat chronic disease will not only improve the nation's health but will also make health care more affordable and help boost long-term growth in the economy.

Check out some of the Almanac's numbers:

  • During 2007, the U.S. spent an estimated $1.7 trillion treating patients with one or more chronic conditions - the equivalent of 34 million annual salaries of $50,000.
  • Without change, the U.S. will experience a more than 50% growth in cases of cancer, mental disorders and diabetes and more than 40% growth in heart disease.
  • An obese 70-year-old will spend approximately 20% more on health care over their lifetime - nearly $40,000 - than a peer of normal weight.

To feel the full impact of this last point, you've got to check out the Obesity Map.  A pretty powerful visual on the evolution of the obesity crisis in the US.

Percent of U.S. Adults Who Are Obese

But let me sign-off with at least one encouraging statistic:

  • Spending just $10 per person per year on chronic disease prevention programs would save the U.S. more than $16 billion within 5 years.

 The positive take-home message here is that disease management and prevention strategies work, and a small output now will have a tremendous impact in the future.  Ten bucks each for prevention?  That's a number we should all be talking about.

Courtney Gray Haupt, Senior Director, Public Affairs and Health Policy

Tags: , , , , ,

 
Colleen
Butz

Four Weeks to the 2009 ADA National Capital Tour de Cure

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Still Enough Time to Register You and Your Team and Support Finding a Cure for Diabetes

As 2009 ADA National Capital Tour de Cure sponsor, Spectrum would like to remind you that there is still time to register for this year's ride. The ride will take place along the W&OD Trail, starting in the DC suburb of Reston, Va., on Sunday, June 14, 2009.

In addition to Spectrum's "SpokesPersons" team, over 1,500 bike riders from corporations, unions, family and friends, bike clubs, and individual participants will take the challenge with the ADA to find a cure. The 2009 ADA National Capital Tour de Cure welcomes riders of all kinds, whether you're a novice or avid cyclist. With a Century Ride, Half Metric Century and Family Fun ride (just to name a few), the Tour offers different routes that can meet all levels of experience. Interested teams and individuals can register and fundraise online.

To help you prepare for the ride, the ADA, Spectrum and 2009 ADA National Capital Tour de Cure Television Sponsor DC 50 have teamed up to provide ride participants with the "Biking for a Cause" blog. The blog provides nutrition, fitness and bike safety tips to help riders train and make this year's ride a fun, safe day for all.

The goal of this year's National Capital Tour de Cure is to raise over $530,000 to support the ADA's mission to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of people affected by diabetes. Donations raised through the Tour will fund research for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, prevention programs, education programs, and residential and day camps for children affected by diabetes and advocacy initiatives. The 2009 ADA National Capital Tour de Cure Chair, and Spectrum President & CEO John Seng discusses this and much more about the importance of the ride in an interview with DC 50.

If cycling isn't for you, the ADA could use your support as a volunteer. Contact ADA's Cassandra Christian at (202) 331-8303 x4518 or at cchristian@diabetes.org for more information about the many fun and rewarding opportunities available.

Colleen Butz, Account Executive

Tags: , , ,

 
Cherry
Dumaual

Insights From a Concierge for Patients, Docs and Nurses

Friday, May 15th, 2009

I just spent a fascinating half hour with a concierge for patients, doctors and nurses. I met Wanda tonight at "An Extraordinary Celebration" - the event marking the partnership of Gilda's Club Worldwide and The Wellness Community.

As I wandered around the cocktail reception, I saw this gracious, elegant women in basic black and struck a conversation with her.  After introducing myself, I found out Wanda serves as a concierge for one of the top hospital organizations in New York. I was intrigued because I've always been fascinated on what it's like to be a concierge, or one who attends to the wishes of guests.

Wanda told me she serves patients, doctors and nurses. The hospital she works for wants to make sure they get great service - to keep patients coming and to retain docs and nurses. I asked Wanda what type of service she provides. She answered nothing too extraordinary in a hospital setting, but now and then nurses want a special brand of yogurt ice cream or want Starbucks (even if a Starbucks store is too far away).  Whatever is asked of her, Wanda tries to provide TLC - Tender Loving Concierging, whenever she can.  Sometimes though, she says no, sorry I can't provide you that specifically, but I can offer you an equally satisfying alternative.

Speaking with Wanda got me thinking - should our docs, nurses and other healthcare practitioners begin acting more like concierges? Should they treat patients more like guests? I certainly would like to be treated more like a guest when I visit my PCP for my annual.  What about you?

Cherry Dumaual, Senior Vice President

Tags: ,