Author Archive

Juliet
Glassroth

Blaming the Victim: Food vs. Fat Folly

Friday, August 3rd, 2012

I recently took to Spectrum’s blog to vent a bit about the confusing nutritional landscape. I asked the question “with all the great nutritional research available, why are so many of us still fat?”

Personally, I think it’s a little more complicated than people just making poor nutritional choices and not exercising enough. I sometimes feel that we blame the victim with regards to obesity.

Now, I am not denying that there are significant behavior changes that can, should and yet often are not made. I don’t want to be critical of Paula Deen, but she did open herself up to a backlash when she talked about her diabetes diagnosis. And kudos to her for altering her diet and adding in exercise. I hope a lot of people learn and benefit from her example and the changes she’s made.

But I don’t drink a ton of sweet tea, eat fried chicken or wrap hamburgers in donuts. And I bet a lot of other people with weight problems don’t do any of those things either. So what gives? (more…)

Tags: ,

 
Juliet
Glassroth

Tell Me Something I Don’t Know: Food Fact Frustrations

Monday, July 16th, 2012

Do you ever find yourself asking: why is America fat? It’s certainly not due to a lack of information about nutrition. New research comes out pretty much daily. For instance, just this past week there were reports that:

  • Though “the majority of Americans say they’ve been trying to eat more fruits and vegetables over the past year…” (according to a poll of 1,057 adults for the International Food Information Council Foundation) “…most people are consuming less than half of what the government recommends.” (July 10, USA Today)
  • “Substituting other sweeteners for sugars may help people lose weight and help people with diabetes control blood sugar, according to a new joint statement issued by the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.” (July 9, WebMD)

How many related articles appear in magazines or online every day? And I am not just talking about the “Best Celebrity Beach Bodies” articles. There is a lot of science-backed media coverage coming at us as well. Remember the stir created by New York Times reporter Tara Parker Pope’s “The Fat Trap” article? Girlfriend had no shortage of research and data to share in her article; it was far from fluff. And that is just one example of dozens of similar articles.

And yet very little, if anything, seems to be changing. In fact, there is every indication that things are getting worse.

Is it all just too confusing for us? For every argument made to “eat paleo,” there’s an “all plant-based, all the time” message. For every “eat this and not that” comment, you can hear a corresponding cry of “it’s about the calories, stupid.” It’s gotten to the point where you need a Ph.D. just to assess your snack options.

Here’s the thing: I don’t think research on its own is going to change behaviors. We need some sort of translation. How do we extract the most meaningful information and incorporate into our lives in a way that will actually work?

We need the right translator to help us navigate all the nutritional landmines. Spectrum translates a lot of complex, scientific language every day, crunching data in a way that makes sense to the people with or without a Ph.D. I know for our clients’ audiences, it helps them to make decisions – whether that decision is to purchase a particular product or even to eat a particular food.

In the meantime, there are a few things that I see as incontrovertible truths:

1) There is absolutely no debate over the fact that we all need to eat more vegetables (and some, but not too much fruit).

2) Sugar is not good for you (but it’s in pretty much everything we eat, so be careful!).

3) Even though we hear this information ALL THE TIME, the obesity epidemic is growing.

What do you think? Are you as overloaded by nutritional information as I am? Would having some translation help you assess the way you look at food? Let us know!

Tags: , , , ,

 
Juliet
Glassroth

Go Team Go! Top 5 Comm Tips for Increased Employee Engagement

Thursday, June 21st, 2012

The Spectrum team at our 15-Year Anniversary Celebration

Employees can be the strongest brand ambassadors and champions for any organization. Often, the highest performing companies are those that most successfully engage their internal constituents. Ensuring your team understands organizational objectives – and, more importantly, the role they play in achieving those objectives – requires a strategic, thoughtful approach.

There are certain key steps that Spectrum implements often and for good reason; they make a positive impact on our clients’ culture and operations. What follows are a few of these “rules of the road” for successful employee communications programs.

Material & Channel Audit:  It all begins with looking at the materials and processes already in place and determining the best way to optimize the methods and channels used.

Isn’t this obvious? Once clients begin itemizing all of the different types of communication taking place within their organization, they are surprised at the volume. With that list compiled – and the items on it evaluated for efficacy – there’s rarely a need to establish new tools or materials. In fact, it’s usually a case of “less is more.”

Quantitative & Qualitative Research: Establish a baseline. Determine your employees’ current attitudes and perceptions. You may think you know. But until you ask, you don’t know. Feedback from employees (gathered confidentially and at all levels) will lead to a better understanding of key concerns and interests. This is also the way to assess the communication channels your employees find most effective (e.g. face-to-face/in person, email, website, print, etc.).

How do you collect the research? Conduct a sampling of one-on-one interviews as well as cost effective online surveys. We personally like Survey Monkey.

(more…)

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
Juliet
Glassroth

Your Feet Are Made for Walking…And That’s Just What They’ll Do?

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

Recently, I was bemoaning the fact that I couldn’t find enough time to exercise. I work a lot (and often use work as an excuse not to work out. Sound familiar?) and commute by train 40 minutes each day. In response to my whining, a colleague made a very simple suggestion: why not get off the metro one stop early and walk the remainder of the way to the office?  Doing the same thing on the way home would get me very close to the goal of 10,000 steps per day.

Today is National Walking Day, and it has me considering the many virtues of this activity. Walking is such a simple fitness solution. So simple, in fact, that most of us overlook it. But the reality is we can’t afford to overlook any possible offset to the obesity epidemic. It’s no secret that obesity contributes to and even leads to disease. And those of us working at office jobs are at significant risk. As noted in a recent Washington Post article, “People plopped on their behinds for eight to 11 hours daily had about a 15 percent increase in risk of death.” This fuels the notion that walking during the day isn’t just a suggestion for better health, it’s a necessity.

I am a sucker for all the fitness fads – from the Tracy Anderson Method to Insanity to Zumba – if it’s new, I have to know if it’s a silver bullet to getting in shape. I have trouble even counting the number of gyms of which I have been a member over the years. Estimating the amount of dollars wasted is downright depressing. Apparently, a monthly payment doesn’t necessarily equate to assured workouts – at least not for me.  And I don’t think I am alone in allowing all manner of things to get in the way of exercising. It’s easy for me to feel overwhelmed when contemplating having to get to the gym, get changed and get on the treadmill. It just feels like too many steps (no pun intended).

(more…)

Tags: , , ,

 
Juliet
Glassroth

Yoga Needs PR

Tuesday, March 20th, 2012

Lately, yoga’s gotten some bad press. First there was William Broad’s article (and his forthcoming book) about injuries related to yoga. And last month, John Friend, founder and head of Anusara Yoga, left his post amid allegations of financial impropriety and other misconduct. And don’t even get me started on the idea of yoga competitions.

All this just breaks my heart. Over a decade of yoga practice and several teacher trainings have changed my life profoundly in innumerable, positive ways. To paraphrase the immortal words of Donny Osmond, I urge you: please don’t let a few bad apples spoil the whole buncha yogis!

Needless to say, yogis were up in arms (literally and figuratively) about Mr. Broad’s article. It’s important to note that Mr. Broad himself is a long time yoga practitioner. And he states in the piece that: “[Devotees] celebrate [yoga’s] abilities to calm, cure, energize and strengthen. And much of this appears to be true: yoga can lower your blood pressure, make chemicals that act as antidepressants, even improve your sex life.” It is true! I am sure many of the nearly 20 million practitioners in this country would gladly attest to these benefits and many more.

But that doesn’t mean that everyone should just asana their hearts out with abandon. In any fitness DVD – including those for yoga – there are qualifiers up front encouraging people to check with their physician before beginning a new regimen. Why should we expect something different for yoga? Two years ago, I had excruciating tendonitis…from my elliptical trainer! Where was the drama then, I ask you? You know what helped? Yoga.

(more…)

Tags: , , ,

 
Juliet
Glassroth

It’s National Nutrition Month: So, What’s for Dinner (that Won’t Hurt Me)?

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

March is National Nutrition Month. And, while I tend to be pretty focused on food throughout the entire year, it seems somehow morenutrition appropriate to be preoccupied with it as part of a recognized awareness effort.

The food and nutrition landscape is complicated. Words like natural, organic, healthy, whole grains and low fat are used so frequently in so many ways that often messages are either confusing or simply tuned out. Add to that reports on topics as far ranging as the connection between red meat and mortality to the hypothesis that a diet high in soy may lead to a lower risk of prostate cancer. And that was only this week!

These days, the simple act of deciding what to eat for dinner can be exhausting. How much protein do I really need? Should I or shouldn’t I eat soy? What exactly is a “nightshade food”? Am I alkaline enough or too acidic (and what does that even mean, anyway)?!

(more…)

Tags: , , , ,