Archive for the ‘Community Involvement’ Category

John
Seng

Digital Will Start To Eat TV: “Imagine IT”

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

 

The big trend to look out for in 2013: Digital will start to eat TV. We are living in an increasingly four-screen world (phone, tablet, PC and TV) and people are choosing to spend more of their time online either with TV or in place of TV. That is something that I don’t think is fully understood from a media mix and planning perspective.

 -    Jim Lefevere, Director, Global Digital Marketing
Roche Diagnostics
(read more in the 2013 March edition of PM 360)

The Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR) couldn’t have chosen a timelier theme for its upcoming Gala Dinner than “IMAGINE IT.” The IT, of course, stands for Information Technology. Technology is increasingly impacting health care, and on April 29, the Gala will focus on mobile health technology, innovations in women’s health and future technologies to improve patient care.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This year’s SWHR Gala will attract more than 600 representatives of diverse groups from key government health agencies to elected officials and members of the health industry, public health, patient advocacy and media. (It’s THE not-to-be-missed health/science affairs “mixer” in Washington.) Funds raised through the event are directed to public education campaigns, science programs and ongoing activities that support the SWHR mission.

Also, the eighth annual $75,000 SWHR-Medtronic Prize for Scientific Contributions will be awarded to a mid-level scientist for her research on sex differences.

From SWHR Annual Gala, May 2012. Left to Right: Story Landis, PhD, NIH/NINDS; Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, HHS; Patricia Grady, PhD, RN, FAAN, NIH/NINR; Phyllis Greenberger, MSW, SWHR President & CEO

SWHR has moved women’s health and biological differences to the forefront of medical research and policy. Participation in the Gala Dinner directly funds programs in science, advocacy and education to advance women’s health. (I serve on the SWHR board of directors.)

I hope to see you there!

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
Abby
James

The Social (Responsibility) Network: Entrepreneurs team up to award $33 million science prize

Thursday, February 28th, 2013

Last week, more than a century after Alfred Nobel gave most of his will to create the Nobel Prize, three entrepreneurs raised the bar again. Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Google’s Sergey Brin and venture capitalist Yuri Milner gave $33 million to 11 scientists in their newest venture, a philanthropic organization awarding prizes to life scientists.

“Curing a disease should be worth more than scoring a touchdown,” Brin said, so the Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation rewards those who have made significant strides in research that will extend human life.

Critics point out that because the reward—$3.3 million to each winning scientist—does not come until the end of a  long career, it hardly acts as an incentive for kids heady with dreams of athletic fame and movie star fortune. Further, they say, science is collaborative, and rewarding an individual devalues the teamwork inherent in real innovation.  And while R&D is key, utilizing the scientists we have may be more important than motivating new ones. After all, in the life sciences, more doctoral graduates leave school unemployed than with a job.

But the founding sponsors and Breakthrough Prize chair Art Levinson—who also chairs Apple–hope to inspire more appreciation for scientists, especially those whose work saves lives. (The prize does not recognize achievements from different fields of science like geology, zoology or taxonomy.)

Their support isn’t bad for business either: companies have begun to realize the importance of corporate social responsibility, which investors increasingly view as a selling point and some employees (especially Millennials) count as non-negotiable. In fact, a 2008 survey suggests that almost 90 percent of Millennials seek employers with social responsibility values similar to their own and that 86 would consider leaving a company where that is not the case.

(more…)

Tags: ,

 
John
Seng

Getting It Right From The Start

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2012

Earlier this year, we suggested a session topic for the Food and Drug Law Institute’s “Advertising & Promotion” conference, and today’s the day of the session we recommended, on the second day of the two-day FDLI conference.

For an hour, we undertook the subject “Instilling Quality in Promotional Communications From Start To Finish: Effective Collaboration With Marketing and Media Companies.”

I moderated a panel of thought leaders from Daiichi Sankyo (Alan Bergstrom, Senior Director, Commercial Regulatory Affairs), the Center for Communication Compliance (Ilyssa Levins, President and Founder), Zinc Ahead (Hamish Miller, Director of U.S. Operations), and Preeti Pinto and Associates (Preeti Pinto, President).

The session explored how health products companies could more effectively work with their marketing partners, public relations firms and advertising agencies to reduce if not avoid costly delays in the approval of communications materials and programs.

In planning the session with the presenters, I was quite surprised to learn about the additional costs in delays and resources due to the lack of better coordination between the pharma brand teams, their marketing partners and a company’s internal regulatory affairs staff.

For instance, Hamish shared that companies worldwide consistently cancel 15% of planned promotional material, taking as many as 3.5 rounds of review to get material approved. Ilyssa reported her insights that knowledge gaps – such as her anecdote that one-third of participating senior PR agency staff failed a 12-question test on regulatory compliance after three attempts – drive the additional costs, and that optimal training on the details of compliant communications can actually enhance the value regulatory provides to the commercial end of things.

Alan emphasized that companies own an opportunity to improve the drug or device marketing program process by making regulatory departments part of the core team and clarifying expectations regarding authority and decision-making for reviewers, as well as seizing the opportunity to close knowledge gaps via training and testing. Finally, Preeti laid out a proposed pathway to change market behavior by optimizing claims, regulatory compliance and more efficient processes and clearly communicating and developing regulatory guidance and processes.

In preparing my comments, I got the idea to review RFPs that Spectrum has received over the past 18 months and selected prime examples of language in those RFPs that would probably scare some of the regulatory people at the very pharmaceutical firms that would like to do business with firms such as Spectrum. I suggested that companies should bring their brand, regulatory and corporate procurement teams in alignment before developing and sharing RFPs or statements of work (SOWs) in order to promote compliance with FDA advertising and promotion communications guidelines and regulations.

You can obtain a copy of the slides of all the presentations that took place at the conference over the past two days by accessing the FDLI website.

The bottom line with achieving full regulatory compliance in pharma marketing communications is to get it right in the first place. At the end of the day, beginning with an open dialogue and alignment among all parties is good for business; everyone wins. And then the going goes so much more smoothly.

Tags: , , , ,

 
Kelsey
Balimtas

Public Relations – The Sweet Life

Friday, September 21st, 2012

Let me start by saying I’ve never had to go on a coffee run. I’m not asked to make thousands of copies and I always have PLENTY to do. The urban legend of the lowly intern has never been true for me. My name is Kelsey Balimtas, and I’m an intern here at Spectrum.

Spectrum marks my third internship in the communications industry. These internships have been a slight departure from what I had pictured, like planning (and attending) fabulous events, developing huge campaigns for mega corporations whose billboards would be plastered in Times Square, or managing A-list celebrities.

My internship experiences thus far, although they haven’t involved copying or coffee runs, haven’t been all about movie premieres and fancy parties. Krystal Lin, an intern at Weber Shandwick Seattle, says it best:  “No, Real PR Is Not Like Samantha Jones’ PR [From Sex and the City].”

Last night, I had the opportunity to host an event through PRSSA at my school called LA @ AU: How to Break Into the Entertainment Industry, featuring a star-studded panel of AU alumni and entertainment professionals in various fields including:

  • Russell Williams, two-time Academy Award winner for sound work on “Glory” and “Dances With Wolves”;
  • James Middleton, executive producer for the Terminator franchise;
  • Janet Janjigian, president at DC Media Group LA, Inc., former senior vice president of corporate communications for MGM Studios, and Emmy Award-winning  television news producer for NBC Nightly News, ABC News Nightline and CNN; and
  • Vincent Cirrincione, longtime manager for Academy Award-winning actress Halle Berry.

I thought, gazing around the bright, crowded theater: this is what I’ve always imagined PR to be. But all of my excitement was short-lived as I ran around with my battle rattle of notepads, masking tape and a ticket scanner. Of course, our opening soundtrack wasn’t playing, there was another event going at the same venue that was encroaching on our space, and the audience was restless. Awesome.

Of course, eventually, everything fell into place. Before I knew it, Tweets were flying, the audience was laughing and our panelists were inspiring.

Clearly PR isn’t always glamorous. From my internship experience thus far, my key takeaway is definitely that PR is hard work.

As one of the panelists said, “In this industry, you have to wear a lot of hats. Be prepared for the unexpected.”

The event was an evening of communication, chaos and cupcakes. It was nice to get a taste (pun intended) of life as part of the entertainment industry, but at least for the time being, I’ll stick to the writing and research “hat” that I have on. It might not be Hollywood, but it’s pretty sweet.

Tags: , , ,

 
Brittany
Allgood

On the 11th Anniversary of September 11: Expanded Coverage for Responders

Tuesday, September 11th, 2012

Firefighters and other 9/11 responders, and those who worked among the debris of the World Trade Center site have been faced with a host of health-related problems. On Monday, the federal government acknowledged that cancer is certainly among the conditions, adding 58 types of cancer to the list covered by the Zadroga Act. Signed into law by President Obama in 2011, the Zadroga Act ensures that those affected by 9/11 continue to receive monitoring and treatment services for 9/11-related health problems through at least 2015.

Often compared to coal miners, workers laboring in dust for months at the World Trade Center site were exposed to a never-before seen toxic mix of jet fuel residue, chemicals and building materials. Many developed cancer-related health problems, and some have died.

So, why did it take 11 years to make it official?

It takes time to gather research data, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) wanted evidence of a causal relationship between the 9/11 disaster and cancer found in survivors before agreeing to fund between $14.5 million and $33 million for an estimated 950 to 2,150 claims.

“We have urged from the very beginning that the decision whether or not to include cancer be based on science,” said New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

The catalyst for coverage? Science.

Insufficient scientific evidence of a causal relationship was the reason for omitting cancer from the docket of covered illnesses – until research funded by NIOSH found that responder firefighters were almost 10 percent more likely to develop cancer in the seven years post-9/11 than the general U.S. population with similar demographics and 19 percent more likely than their non-exposed counterparts.

Even with this research, NIOSH is only hesitantly adding cancer coverage. In the study’s conclusion, NIOSH says, “we remain cautious in our interpretation of this finding because the time since 9/11 is short for cancer outcomes… we cannot rule out the possibility that effects in the exposed group might be due to unidentified confounders.”

Science: The Great Validator.

This was an unprecedented environmental disaster and the NIOSH is accustomed to relying on extensive studies to help make public health-related decisions. In this case, the connection between 9/11 responders and cancer might have been obvious to some, but the scientific proof solidifies it as fact, giving credibility to the NIOSH decision to add it to the list of government-covered conditions.

What’s the key take away here? Knowing the science behind a decision is crucial–science promotes understanding and credibility.

Tags: , , , ,

 
Anthony
LaFauce

Your Orders Have Been Posted on Facebook, Shipmate!

Friday, June 29th, 2012

Yesterday I witnessed something that I never thought I would. The Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) who is the highest ranking sailor in the United States Navy issued an order via Facebook.  This wasn’t an issue to send a ship somewhere or to deploy S.E.A.Ls into some troubled nation but the significance is still the same.

Due to the fires in Colorado, the CNO ordered all Sailors and family members to report via the NFAAS site. The CNO realized that the best way to reach a group of people, dispersed over a large area, was through social media. To me, this is groundbreaking. I wrote a blog post years ago (2008) on how Twitter could be used to save your life — and it’s great to see this type of thinking in practice.

(more…)