Archive for the ‘FDA’ Category

Nicola
Berkowitz

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting, Through the Eyes of a German Health Care Communicator

Tuesday, February 26th, 2013

Hallo! Allow me to first introduce myself. My name is Nicola, and I work at fischerAppelt, Spectrum’s partner PR agency in Germany. Currently, I’m in Washington as part of GLOBALHealthPR’s ongoing exchange program among its partners.

Last Friday, I attended a meeting with the Neurological Device Panel of the FDA Medical Devices Advisory Committee. The panel came together to advise the FDA on the Premarket Approval Application of a new medical device to treat epilepsy. This device, the RNS System from NeuroPace, uses responsive neurostimulation to monitor and interrupt abnormal electrical activity in the brain before seizures occur. It is supposed to be a new treatment option for patients that had previously been treated with two or more anti-epileptic drugs without achieving seizure control and who are not suitable candidates for surgery.

The meeting showed how different views can reveal very diverse perspectives on a topic. The meeting started at 8am with the sponsor, NeuroPace, providing a well-prepared and well-timed presentation. Afterward, FDA representatives explained their view on the data – which was a rather long reading of facts and figures – and rounded out the presentation with important information regarding the product’s safety.

After the lunch break, the open public hearing started. I have to say, it was quite emotional and moving. Among other presenters, three patients described their lives before and after the implantation of the RNS System and how it changed everything; how they have been able to participate in everyday activities they weren’t able to before and how they can now take responsibility for themselves. Their stories showed how powerful individual and personal perspectives and real-life experiences are, leaving the audience visibly stunned at certain points.

A discussion about the effectiveness and safety of the RNS System followed in the afternoon before the experts were asked about their opinion of different data aspects and details. In the end, the expert panel voted in favor of the new device.

Attending the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting was a very interesting experience for me – as was my entire trip to Washington, D.C. This is a fascinating city and, as I have come to learn, it’s best explored on foot! I also have noticed people here are very active and running is very popular (and people run in shorts – even when it’s 0°C!). And of course, I have picked up some interesting insights into healthcare PR in the U.S. and helpful inspiration to bring back to Germany.

Last but not least, I’d like to thank the people here at Spectrum for welcoming me and taking time to share their experiences! I look forward to continuing and deepening this exchange in the future.

Auf Wiedersehen, Washington!

 
Jenna
Lenskold

We personalize our wardrobes, iPhones and homes. Why not our medicine too?

Wednesday, February 6th, 2013

Earlier this week the Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC) released “Pathways for Oversight of Diagnostics,” a discussion of regulation  surrounding personalized medications. Spectrum is a proud member of PMC, a thriving association focused on spreading awareness of personalized medicine.

How is medicine personal?

Personalized medicine is exactly what it sounds like: treatments and medications that are designed specifically for each individual patient. Personalized medicine exists in all health care arenas. When a patient gets diagnosed with cancer, a treatment plan must be created. Does chemotherapy work better or should the patient undergo surgery? Maybe a combination of both? In physical therapy offices, patients are prescribed a tailored exercise regime. Doctors personalize medicine every day when they prescribe unique dosages of a medication to sick patients. For example, a 250-pound man may need a stronger prescription dosage than a 10 year old boy. (more…)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

 
Amanda
Sellers

A Path to Relieve the Pain – FDA’s Draft Guidance for Abuse-Deterrent Opioids Sets the Tone for Another Year of Collaboration and Problem-Solving

Friday, January 11th, 2013

Over the past few weeks, FDA has been applauded by many for the efficiency and timeliness of 2012 drug approvals, along with several initiatives, such as the “Breakthrough Therapy” designation announcements with Vertex Pharmaceuticals. This progress in product approvals, overall Agency efficiency and the move to collaborate with industry to push science and much needed treatments forward is a welcome harbinger for 2013.

And, to kick-off 2013, FDA released its Draft Guidance for Industry – Abuse-Deterrent Opioids – Evaluation and Labeling, which represents one more proactive step in addressing the challenges of managing pain appropriately, while minimizing the risks of misuse and abuse in society.

(more…)

Tags: , , , ,

 
Amanda
Sellers

Pharma Regulatory Issue? It’s Time for a New Plan

Friday, July 13th, 2012

The communications landscape in pharma and health care has become increasingly more crowded over the past three to five years. With social media, blogs and other online content as well as traditional advertising, how do consumers make health care decisions? How can they distinguish promotional claims from information driven by science and clinical studies?

According to a recent study by Wolters Kluwer, three out of 10 Americans say they “always” or “frequently” turn to the internet to find answers to their medical questions, while nearly 65 percent of Americans who turn to the internet with medical questions say they trust the information they find.

This issue has garnered the attention of the FDA, which is currently developing a study to examine the public’s ability to identify marketing messages from objective medical information. The conundrum is that patients are coming to expect more information from both their doctors and from the drug-makers themselves. In response, many pharmaceutical companies are beginning to use social and online channels to deliver more targeted information to the people who need it. But they are walking a fine line due to the lack of strict guidance. They must work even harder to ensure the content they distribute meets the highest level of regulatory scrutiny.

So what do you do when you’re facing a pharma regulatory issue? Spectrum’s recommendation: Plan ahead.

Yes, with a heavy emphasis on plan. As sensitive a topic as pharma is, it is always important to have the backing of a well-designed communications plan with tools and messaging to help navigate the waters for both professional and consumer audiences. This is our bread and butter or (to be more health conscious) our peas and carrots at Spectrum. We believe in taking proactive measures when it comes issues management planning and it is just one of the ways we love to help our clients every day.

So, we’re curious, what do you think about proactive programs versus reactive programs? Do you have pros and cons of each? Let us know what you think!

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
Amanda
Sellers

PDUFA: Rounding Third, Headed Home

Friday, June 29th, 2012

President Obama got in a little hot water earlier this week when he brought up the Boston Red Sox trade of Kevin Youkilis to the Chicago White Sox while hosting a Boston fundraiser. It wasn’t that great of a decision to bring up this unpleasantness with angry Red Sox fans, but now he has a chance to redeem himself and help an important piece of legislation slide across home plate, figuratively speaking.

Earlier this week, the Senate passed the updated PDUFA legislation that was developed and passed the House earlier in the year. Now that the bill has passed the Senate, it’s on to the POTUS (I want to see how many D.C. acronyms I can get in here). As a refresher, PDUFA is one of the many Washington acronyms that almost no one else outside of the health care world knows – it stands for Prescription Drug User Fee Act. If you need the PDUFA Cliff Notes check out my last blog post and check out FiercePharma and Washington Post for more coverage on what it all means when in practice. 

So, what does PDUFA really mean? It means that the FDA will have more resources to process drug applications, including the new additions of generic drugs and biosimilars (more affordable versions of biologic drugs) to the mix. This is great news for not only the FDA, but for the companies pushing innovation in medicines and new treatment options. But, most importantly, patients will reap the greatest benefit from this legislation. This is one piece of legislation that touches everyone in the U.S. who currently takes a prescription medicine or will take one in the future — which should be just about everyone. Quicker, more efficient review times without a heavy financial burden on the system is positive progress enough, but providing patients with a wider range of better treatment options is the best outcome anyone could hope for.

President Obama, since you’re on a roll with health care legislation, please give this legislation your stamp of approval too. Lots of folks are counting on this for another five years of PDUFA!

Tags: , ,

 
John
Seng

Pre-Competitive = Pro-Patient?

Thursday, June 21st, 2012

I attended a BIO 2012 “super session” this afternoon moderated by my friend Margaret Anderson, executive director of Washington, DC-based Faster Cures, a leading advocacy group to “improve the medical research enterprise.”

Margaret led a panel of the top people from NIH, FDA, Harvard Medical School, Lilly Research Laboratories and Sanofi, who each presented a perspective on “pre-competitive collaboration.” In other words, let’s work together under a flag of truce. (That is, until somebody fires the first shot.)

“Pre-competitive collaboration” means that companies who guard their secrets today should instead pull back the veil a little to work in synergy with competitors who would otherwise want to eat their lunch today and dinner tomorrow.

Unsurprisingly, each expert shed a few fresh insights, but generally much we’ve all heard before with regard to how expensive, unwieldy and slow typical clinical trials still are.

Rather than recite or summarize everything shared, suffice to say I devoted about 90 minutes to a session in which everyone on stage agreed that things are bad, that more and much earlier collaboration and sharing of data needs to be done, and how progress against disease state after disease state suffers because we’re not talking with one another soon enough in the process. From obesity to lack of optimal pain management, from cancer to Alzheimer’s disease, the panelists fretted about the challenges and generally agreed that the best hope is earlier, smarter and perhaps more courageous (my word) collaboration.

(more…)